AI Agent Monitoring

AI agent monitoring for
agents already in production

AI agent monitoring for agents already in production

VoxMith reads every conversation your AI agent has, finds the ones that failed, names the cause,
and tells you what each failure cost. Voice and chat, after the session ends, no sampling

VoxMith reads every conversation your AI agent has, finds the ones that failed, names the cause, and tells you what each failure cost. Voice and chat, after the session ends, no sampling

VoxMith reads every conversation your AI agent has, finds the ones that failed, names the cause, and tells you what each failure cost. Voice and chat, after the session ends, no sampling

What is AI agent monitoring?

AI agent monitoring is the practice of checking every conversation a deployed agent has with real users, to
find the ones that failed, identify why, and fix them.

AI agent monitoring is the practice of checking every conversation a deployed agent has with real users, to find the ones that failed, identify why, and fix them.

It differs from uptime and application monitoring, which tell you the system responded.

Every dashboard you own

400

400

milliseconds

Success

The actual conversation

A confident, wrong answer

Failed

An agent can respond in 400 milliseconds with a confident, wrong answer and every dashboard you own will call that a success.

Agent failures do not
throw errors

Traditional monitoring was built for systems that fail loudly. An agent fails politely.
The request returns 200, the trace looks clean, and the user leaves without what they came for.

Traditional monitoring was built for systems that fail loudly. An agent fails politely. The request returns 200, the trace looks clean, and the user leaves without what they came for.

What your monitoring sees

All Green

Request

200 OK

Response time

400 MS

Trace

Clean

Status

Success

Did the system work?

YES

What the user got

FAILED

Move my booking to the 14th.

Sure. Which date would you like?

The 14th. I just said that.

User left the session

Did this person get helped?

NO

What your monitoring sees

All Green

Request

200 OK

Response time

400 MS

Trace

Clean

Status

Success

What the user got

FAILED

Move my booking to the 14th.

Sure. Which date would you like?

The 14th. I just said that.

User left the session

Did the system work?

YES

Did this person get helped?

NO

How VoxMith monitors every session

Your conversation
data stays yours

Four things happen to each conversation, starting the moment it closes.

1

Capture every session, with no sampling

Each session is analysed when it ends:

Full turn-by-turn transcript

Tool calls

Retrievals

Metadata

Timing of every turn, for voice agents

Sampling is fine for latency, which is common. It is useless for quality, because the failures that cost the most are rare. A two percent sample misses almost all of them.

2

Detect failures the moment a session ends

Each session is scored against the outcome it was meant to reach. VoxMith flags:

Hallucinated answers

Workflow failures

Tool and API errors

Policy violations

Drop-offs

Escalations

Unmet requests

You can add your own rules in plain language and they become evaluators that run on every session.

3

Trace the cause, not the symptom

Knowing a session failed is half an answer. VoxMith attaches a cause from a fixed taxonomy:

The tool errored

The tool was never called

Retrieval came back empty

A parameter was wrong

The data was stale

The capability does not exist

The prompt left a gap

Latency ran long

One cause per failure, with the session attached as evidence.

4

Turn the failure into a fix

Recurring causes are grouped and ranked by what they cost. Each one arrives with a specific recommendation and the sessions that prove it.

One click sends it to GitHub as a pull request, or to Jira or Linear as a ticket, with the evidence attached.

Evals that run on production traffic

Most eval tooling runs before you ship, against cases you thought of in advance.

Before you ship

Cases you thought of in advance

Catches regressions on known problems and nothing else

You cannot write a test for a failure you have not seen yet.

On live traffic, with VoxMith

Every session is scored against your rules, continuously

A new failure mode shows up the week it appears, rather than the quarter someone notices

When a failure class is fixed, it becomes a standing check, and you find out if it comes back

This is the half of evaluation nobody covers. Pre-launch testing proves your agent handles what you imagined. Production evals tell you what your users actually did.

The metrics VoxMith monitors

Six numbers carry most of the signal. The first answers whether the
agent is doing its job. The rest explain why it moved.

Metric

What it tells you

Healthy range

Resolution rate

Share of sessions where the user got what they came for

Your baseline

Your baseline

Containment

Share finished without a human picking it up

70%+

70%+

Correction rate

How often the user had to put the agent right

Lower is better

Lower is better

Repetition rate

How often the user said the same thing twice

Lower is better

Lower is better

Drop-off rate

Share where the user left mid-session

Lower is better

Lower is better

Escalation rate

Handoffs to a human, split by avoidable and not

Lower is better

Lower is better

Tool error rate

Failed and silently empty tool calls

Lower is better

Lower is better

Response latency

Time to first token or first word, p50 and p95

Under 800 ms

Under 800 ms

Cost per resolved session

Cost per resolved
session

Total spend divided by sessions that worked

Trend down

Trend down

Work out what yours cost

Monitoring, observability and
evals are three different jobs

Monitoring, observability and evals are three different jobs

These words get used as if they mean the same thing.
They answer different questions and you need all three.

These words get used as if they mean the same thing. They answer different questions and you need all three.

Metric

Observability

Evals

Agent monitoring

Question it answers

What did my system do?

Does it still handle the cases I know about?

Did this person get helped?

When it runs

Continuously

Before you ship

After every session

Data it uses

Spans, logs, latency

A fixed test set

Real user conversations

What it misses

Clean traces on a failed outcome

Anything you did not think of

Infrastructure faults

Output

Dashboards and alerts

Pass or fail

Ranked causes with a cost

Metric

Observability

Evals

Agent monitoring

Question it answers

What did my system do?

Does it still handle the cases I know about?

Did this person get helped?

When it runs

Continuously

Before you ship

After every session

Data it uses

Spans, logs, latency

A fixed test set

Real user conversations

What it misses

Clean traces on a failed outcome

Anything you did not think of

Infrastructure faults

Output

Dashboards and alerts

Pass or fail

Ranked causes with a cost

Question it answers

Observability

What did my system do?

Evals

Does it still handle the cases I know about?

Monitoring

Did this person get helped?

When it runs

Observability

Continuously

Evals

Before you ship

Monitoring

After every session

Data it uses

Spans, logs, latency

Observability

A fixed test set

Evals

Real user conversations

Monitoring

What it misses

Clean traces on a failed outcome

Observability

Anything you did not think of

Evals

Infrastructure faults

Monitoring

Output

Dashboards and alerts

Observability

Pass or fail

Evals

Ranked causes with a cost

Monitoring

Observability tells you the request succeeded. Evals tell you nothing broke that you were already watching.
Monitoring in this sense is the only one that reads the conversation.

Observability tells you the request succeeded. Evals tell you nothing broke that you were already watching. Monitoring in this sense is the only one that reads the conversation.

Voice and chat in one view

The same analysis runs on both, which matters when the same customer reaches you

through a chat widget on Monday and a phone line on Tuesday. Resolution, correction and
repetition mean the same thing in either channel.

Voice adds signals that have no equivalent in text, and
they are where voice agents actually fail:

Dead air before a reply

Measured in seconds. The caller hears silence and assumes the line dropped.

Barge-in

Who cut off whom, and on which turn. Two people talking at once is a failure the transcript hides.

Time to first word

The latency that decides whether a caller stays on the line.

The turn the caller quit

Abandonment located to an exact moment, with the cause attached.

Dead air before a reply

Measured in seconds. The caller hears silence and assumes the line dropped.

Barge-in

Who cut off whom, and on which turn. Two people talking at once is a failure the transcript hides.

Time to first word

The latency that decides whether a caller stays on the line.

The turn the caller quit

Abandonment located to an exact moment, with the cause attached.

Read the transcript of these sessions and every one looks fine. The failure is in the timing.

Alerts when a failure starts spreading

Traditional monitoring was built for systems that fail loudly. An agent fails politely.The request returns 200, the trace looks clean, and the user leaves without what they came for.

One bad session

Noise

A single bad session

Same cause, 40 times in a day

A release that went wrong

The same cause appearing forty times in a day

VoxMith alerts on the pattern, not the incident.

Threshold alerts

Set a threshold on any metric or failure cause and get told when it crosses.

Drift detection

After a prompt change or a model swap, drift detection compares the new traffic against the baseline so you learn whether the change helped before your users do.

Set up in about
five minutes

Install the SDK and swap your provider import. No infrastructure changes, no change to how your agent behaves.

1

Install the SDK

One code snippet, any framework

Copy component

Copied

pip install voxmith

2

Connect your agents

Automatic data collection starts

Copy component

Copied

from voxmith.ai.provider_openai import OpenAI

Your dashboard starts filling

As soon as sessions begin flowing.

Your conversation data stays yours

Your conversation
data stays yours

Encrypted in transit and at rest. Personal data is handled automatically on ingestion. VoxMith never trains on customer data.

Encrypted by default

Data is encrypted in transit and at rest to protect sensitive conversation data.

Your data stays yours

Customer conversations are never used to train AI models.

Deploy your way

Run VoxMith in your own cloud, on-premises, or in air-gapped environments.

Access under control

Manage permissions with role-based access, audit logs, and configurable data retention and deletion.

VoxMith is SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA
and GDPR compliant.

VoxMith is SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR compliant.

SOC 2 compliant
SOC 2 compliant
HIPAA compliant
GDPR compliant

AI agent monitoring FAQs

What is AI agent monitoring?

AI agent monitoring is the practice of checking every conversation a deployed agent has with real users to find the ones that failed, identify the cause and fix them. It differs from uptime monitoring, which tells you the system responded but not whether the user got what they came for.

How do you monitor an AI agent in production?

Instrument the agent so every session is captured, then analyse each one after it closes. Score it against the outcome it was meant to reach, classify any failure by cause, group recurring causes and alert when one rises. VoxMith does this with an SDK that installs in about five minutes.

Which metrics matter most for AI agent monitoring?

Resolution rate, containment, correction rate, repetition rate, drop-off rate and cost per resolved session. Resolution rate is the headline, because it answers whether the user got what they came for. The others explain why that number moved.

What is the difference between agent monitoring and observability?

Observability tells you what your system did: spans, latency, errors and traces. Monitoring in the VoxMith sense tells you what the user got. A session can have clean traces, a 200 response and no errors, and still leave the user without an answer.

Does VoxMith sample sessions or analyse every one?

Every session. Sampling works for performance metrics because latency is common. It fails for quality, because the failures that cost the most are rare, and a two percent sample will miss almost all of them.

What causes AI agent failures in production?

Most production failures trace to a handful of causes: a tool that errored, a tool that was never called, retrieval that came back empty, a wrong parameter, stale data, a capability the agent does not have, a gap in the prompt, or latency that ran long. Almost none of them raise an exception.

Is this component responsive?

Yes, the FAQ component is fully responsive and adapts seamlessly to desktop, tablet, and mobile screen sizes.

Is this component responsive?

Yes, the FAQ component is fully responsive and adapts seamlessly to desktop, tablet, and mobile screen sizes.

Start monitoring every session

Start monitoring every session

Your agent gets better the moment production conversations start flowing in.
Start small, grow into it.

Your agent gets better the moment production conversations
start flowing in. Start small, grow into it.

Your agent gets better the moment production conversations start flowing in.
Start small, grow into it.

VoxMith

Production intelligence for conversational AI.
Continuously improve AI agents.

© 2026 VoxMith. All rights reserved.

manvendra.singh@voxmith.com

VoxMith

Production intelligence for conversational AI. Continuously improve AI agents.

© 2026 VoxMith. All rights reserved.

manvendra.singh@voxmith.com

VoxMith

Production intelligence for conversational AI. Continuously improve AI agents.

© 2026 VoxMith. All rights reserved.

manvendra.singh@voxmith.com